For years, Jira has been the dominant project management tool for people who love Agile methodology. But it’s not the most user-friendly software. Hubstaff Tasks, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more intuitive way to adopt the core principles of Agile — without getting bogged down by complex features or clunky workflows.
Which one is better?
Both Jira and Hubstaff Tasks have Agile principles in their DNA. Sprint planning, Kanban boards, Epics, and other tools give users everything they need to tackle big projects by breaking them into manageable stages. But the biggest difference between these two platforms is usability.
Jira is ideal for teams that are comfortable with a high level of complexity. The user interface isn’t intuitive, and setup can be challenging. It also lacks some views found in other project management software.
Hubstaff Tasks is a simpler, more straightforward tool. It’s designed around flexible Agile features that less tech-minded users will be comfortable with. Tasks also comes with built-in time tracking to give managers a better idea of how the team is working.
Hubstaff Tasks is designed to make Agile easy. The user interface is simple and intuitive while still giving managers the ability to customize features so that they work best for their team. The Agile jargon is also minimal, which makes Tasks easier for non-dev team members to use.
Hubstaff Tasks gives you a simple way to create Sprints that help your team stay focused. You can plan two Sprints in advance along with seeing the Current Sprint and Sprint Backlog all in one view. Add deadlines, labels, assignees, checklists, followers, and more to each Sprint you build. See every Task across your team or filter down to view only what specific team members are working on.
Again, the built-in time tracking is what makes Tasks’ Epic feature stand out. See how many hours have gone into each Epic and whether those hours match your estimate for the work. If you also use Hubstaff’s work management software, you can set a pay rate for each team member to see the labor costs associated with different tasks and Epics.
Jira makes it relatively simple to create Epics: just include a summary, description, due dates, and other relevant details. You can track the completion of the Epic based on the delivery of user stories and can also link tasks and bugs to the Epics. This helps you keep track of all the work completed and how that work ties back to larger initiatives.
Much like the software itself, Hubstaff Tasks keeps the pricing options simple and easy to understand. The free plan gives you five users with limited storage and Epics. However, you’ll miss out on some of the more advanced Agile features: automated Stand-ups, Timelines, Teams, and the Roadmap. The free plan is a great way to test-drive Hubstaff Tasks quickly, but you’ll want to upgrade to Premium (for just $5/user per month) for all the extra Agile features.
What made me really fall in love with Hubstaff Tasks is the fact you get more for less, and that’s something you rarely see these days for a project management app.
Jira offers three different plans (four, if you include enterprise). Pricing is based on the types of features you need, how many users you have, and whether you pay monthly or annually. So yes, there’s a lot to consider.
It offers a free plan for up to 10 users, but you won’t get access to all the Agile features. Most users will likely want to consider Jira’s Standard ($7/user per month) or Premium ($14/user per month) plans depending on the size of their team and what types of projects they plan to manage.
Much like the software itself, Hubstaff Tasks keeps the pricing options simple and easy to understand. The free plan gives you five users with limited storage and Epics. However, you’ll miss out on some of the more advanced Agile features: Stand-ups, Timelines, Teams, and the Roadmap. The free plan is a great way to test-drive Hubstaff Tasks quickly, but you’ll want to upgrade to Premium (for just $5/user per month) for all the extra Agile features.
Overall, Jira has cheap and transparent pricing, though things can get a little weird for larger organizations. That’s due to the way the cost scales for organizations with more than a hundred people.
Tasks vs. Jira: The verdict
Jira is a solid project management tool with deep roots in Agile methodology. Software engineers love how flexible it is and how it helps them manage large and complex projects. But Jira isn’t a great fit for less tech-minded users or people looking for a more streamlined solution.
Hubstaff Tasks, however, helps teams harness the power of Agile even if they’re not comfortable using complex software. Its built-in time tracking feature also makes it stand out from other project management tools.
Which one is right for you? If you need to manage large or complicated projects and don’t mind learning complex software, try Jira.
But if you need a simpler project management tool that everyone on your team can use, Hubstaff Tasks is probably right for you.